Why the fermi paradox is based on presumption02.06.24

Asking the Wrong Question in Order to Derive the Right Answer. The Fermi Paradox is an example of just such a tactic of obfuscation.

α:  It presumes mankind to know the relevant range of what constitutes an inhabitant life form

β :  It presumes mankind to know the means by which inhabitants would ostensibly communicate

γ :  It presumes that all inhabitants are distant

δ :  It presumes that technology takes only a single path and direction similar to mankind’s own

ε :  It presumes that all communication media throughout the galaxy are similar to ours

ζ :  It presumes that we would recognize all forms of communication similar to ours

η :  It presumes that inhabitants would broadcast in omnidirectional and powerful EM signals or would be directing their EM energy straight toward us only

θ :  It presumes that inhabitants would broadcast ‘in the clear’ (i.e. unencrypted outside the cosmic background radiation)

ι :    It presumes that broadcasting inhabitants would have also presumed that no one was listening to them and/or would not care

κ :  It presumes that life can exist inside only our relative frame of reference/dimensionality

λ :  It presumes that we have examined a significant amount of space

μ :  It presumes that we rigorously know what space and time are, and its reductive inference upon radiation to be

ν :  It presumes that we have rigorously studied the timeframe in which an advanced civilization could broadcast during its development history

It presumes that mankind’s life originated only upon Earth through abiogenesis 
     It presumes that all intelligent life is noisy
     It presumes that all universal inhabitants are full time bound by our frame of reference/dimensionality
     It presumes that we have actually looked for inhabitant signals
     It presumes that humankind’s existence is lacking in agency
     It presumes that science/skepticism is lacking in agency
     It presumes that those who might have observed such communication in the past (distant or recent), would expose this circumstance
     It precludes the idea that a subset of mankind is already communicating

https://theethicalskeptic.com/2018/10/02/the-fermi-paradox-is-babysitting-rubbish/

Anonymous

Why the fermi paradox is based on presumption02.06.24

Information Epoch 1725762505